Of the impressionist paintings
available to be chosen, the one painting that resonated with me most was
Gustave Caillebotte’s “Paris Street, Rainy Day”. This is a scene of a busy street being
traveled on from many angles. Caillebotte’s use of lines and color are
extraordinary. He has masterfully used
the impressionist method of painting blocks of light and color to acquire his personal
impression of the scene in front of him.
There is some time spent in detail, so I would not classify this as
strictly impressionistic, but also would have to include some realism was
having influence on Caillebotte. When I
see this painting I get a charge of renew, a sense of “a new day coming”. There is a sense that we are all moving in
different directions headed to our sunlight spot in the world.
Our
text does not go into great detail about the painting, but what I see are a
wide variety of lateral lines that seem to tilt the picture to the side, as
exampled by the cobblestone road aligning to the three walkers on the right and
beyond. I can see three vanishing points
being used to bring a wide variety of depth to this scene. One such line is located to the left of the left-centered
building at street level, and another is to the right of the same building,
again at street level just to the right of the lamppost. The
third point is somewhere off to the right a ways away from the canvas. The cobblestone street is drawn from that
vanishing point. The strictly vertical lamppost
brings the viewer back into balance and gives the viewer something to “hold on
to” while the rest of the painting seems to be sliding off to the right. There is a certain line orientation that is
discombobulated between the lines on the street, the unseen lines and the line
of sight that each subject is using.
This appears to be that this painting is moving in many directions all
at once. The use of these lines in
itself pushes this painting towards realism. Further can be taken into account if you have
the subject matter in the discussion.
When looking
at the colors offered in this painting, they are bright at the right side of
the painting and rather drab otherwise. I
believe this was done to bring a certain amount of balance from bright to drab,
right to left. There are only a few
sections of bright color scattered throughout the rest of the painting. There is a large amount of earth tone color
in the brick and a much flatter sidewalk area where the walkers stroll on the
right hand side. There is a large amount
of muted light throughout the left side of the painting and above in the
sky. There is also a great study of reflection
on the street and walkways. The light and dark sections of each subject are
well done. With such a high
concentration of the bright orange to the right, it lends one to wonder if the
road to the right is much brighter and shinier than the current one being
rained on. As I analyze the shadows in
this painting by Caillebotte, I notice that they are headed in different
directions. Especially when you take a
close look at the umbrellas and walkers shadows. I take this to imply that perhaps “light”
shines in all directions….are you willing to see the light or be mired in the
rain?
The
brushstrokes seem very broad and rough toward the foreground, and in the
background they are less broad and more detailed. More detail as noted by the almost perfect
looking windows and iron work on the buildings.
There is also a certain array of shapes in the painting as well. I see lots of linear lines as well as oval
based subject matter throughout it. For
example, there is an oval look to the street and deviated ovals in the
umbrellas throughout. A “world of ovals
and round existing amongst the lines of formality”.
The sheer size of the
painting tells me that the artist wanted you to stand in front of this painting
and feel you could take 3 steps into it.
The capture of the lighting and muted sky really lend to the feeling of
a new day with multiple ways of getting to where you want to go. My resonance with this art piece comes from a memory from years ago, and that in itself has me wanting to run into this painting figuretively.
I agree that Gustave Caillebotte’s “Paris Street, Rainy Day” does not entirely look Impressionist because of the detailed background. But at the same time, I think that it is a great example of an Impressionist style painting because of the unfocused and less detailed portion of the painting and the bright lights and colors that illuminate the streets of Paris. The use of three vanishing points makes the painting look like it is leading the viewer in all directions at the same time and it is hard to concentrate on any particular detail until you get used to the painting. Great post!
ReplyDeleteLesya
I liked your mention of the lamp post giving us something to "hold on to". I hadn't noticed how important the lamppost is the to balance of this painting until you mentioned it and I attempted to imagine the work without it. It seems to help guide the eye from the foreground to the building in the background where you mentioned a vanishing point is. Great observation!
ReplyDeleteI have to say, I love this painting. When it is small on my computer screen, it is lifelike. The colors, highlights and shadows are beautiful and to me realistic. The painting would not be the same without that lamppost. The way he captured the shadow of the man walking across the street in the water gathered between the cobbles is delightful. The perspective of the building is lovely and I have always loved 2 and 3 point perspectives.
ReplyDelete